Native dispute with invasion/settlement and the Eastern/Western paradigm

An adequate solution maybe in future for standard universal income, and a fund established from the profits of western science, medicine, and technology, to compensate displaced minorities. The Aboriginals should receive benefits thereby, such as free food, transport and accommodation within the cities, and the social contexts would facilitate their entry and departure ideally from the technocratic to natural world divide. Can this utopian standard be invigorated consistently within cities, which are the sole habitat of technocrats? A naturists ideal would permeate inevitably allowing a peaceful coexistence between those technocrats attaining autonomy within market liberalism, and at equity with the lore (void of those avoiding paying taxes, as demonstrable by the president elect, or Apple’s chief and the “political crap” mentality). We would find that the naturists prove to be the best of the entertainers and peace makers within the ideal utopia, honoring the technocrats with presence within their sustainable artificial domain. The other side, is the hunter mentality of false prophets, so inextricably working into the public psyche through the most notable members of the states, at the forums of the United Nations; what we might expect of technocrats within the naturists domain, and the normal illegally endowed technocratic dystopia. Of course attaining utopian standards dependent on liberating emancipatory idealism, which the western motif through psychology, and the standards of mental illness, however abstracted, disallows in direct oppression for market liberalist assumptive equivocation.